高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Efficacy of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition as potential cachexia screening tool for patients with solid cancer

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Clinical Nutrition, Capital MedicalUniversity Affiliated Beijing Shijitan Hospital, No.10Tieyi Road Haidian Dist,Beijing 100038, China [2]Key Laboratory of Cancer FSMP for State Market Regulation,Beijing 100038, China [3]Beijing International Science and TechnologyCooperation Base for Cancer Metabolism and Nutrition, Beijing 100038, China [4]The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of WenzhouMedical University, Wenzhou 325000, China [5]Cancer Center of the First Hospitalof Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China [6]Department of ComprehensiveOncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Centerfor Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and PekingUnion Medical College, Beijing, China [7]Yunnan University, Kunming 650091,China [8]Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Henan Key Laboratoryof Tumor Epidemiology College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China
出处:

关键词: Cancer Cachexia GLIM PG-SGA Screening tools

摘要:
Cachexia has a very high prevalence in patients with cancer, and lacks effective screening tools yet. Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) is a novel malnutrition assessment tool, with increased important roles in malnutrition diagnosis for patients with cancer. However, whether GLIM can be used as an effective screening tool remains unknown.We performed a multicenter cohort study including 8,478 solid tumor patients from 40 clinical centers throughout China. Cachexia was diagnosed based on the 2011 international cancer cachexia consensus. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were developed to determine the efficacy and clinical net benefit of GLIM and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) in the detection of cancer cachexia, respectively.According to the consensus guidelines, 1,441 (17.0%) cancer patients were diagnosed with cachexia among 8,478 patients in the present study. The sensitivity of one-step GLIM and two-step GLIM for detecting cachexia were 100 and 88.8%, respectively, while that of PG-SGA was 86.2%. The accuracies of one-step GLIM and two-step GLIM reached 67.4 and 91.3%, which were higher than that of PG-SGA (63.1%). The area under the curves (AUCs) of one-step GLIM (0.835) and two-step GLIM (0.910) were higher than PG-SGA (0.778) in patients with cancer. The DCA also revealed that two-step GLIM had better clinical effect than PG-SGA between 20-50% threshold probabilities.GLIM could be used as an effective tool in screening cancer cachexia, two-step GLIM criteria show more accurate while one-step GLIM criteria is more sensitive.ChiCTR1800020329.© 2022. The Author(s).

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 营养学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 营养学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Clinical Nutrition, Capital MedicalUniversity Affiliated Beijing Shijitan Hospital, No.10Tieyi Road Haidian Dist,Beijing 100038, China [2]Key Laboratory of Cancer FSMP for State Market Regulation,Beijing 100038, China [3]Beijing International Science and TechnologyCooperation Base for Cancer Metabolism and Nutrition, Beijing 100038, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Clinical Nutrition, Capital MedicalUniversity Affiliated Beijing Shijitan Hospital, No.10Tieyi Road Haidian Dist,Beijing 100038, China [2]Key Laboratory of Cancer FSMP for State Market Regulation,Beijing 100038, China [3]Beijing International Science and TechnologyCooperation Base for Cancer Metabolism and Nutrition, Beijing 100038, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:82490 今日访问量:0 总访问量:681 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 云南省第一人民医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:云南省昆明市西山区金碧路157号