高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Outcomes of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt and Gastric Coronary Vein Embolization for Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ ESCI

机构: [1]Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Intervent Radiol, Jian She Rd, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China [2]First Peoples Hosp Honghe State, Southern Cent Hosp Yunnan Prov, Dept Intervent Radiol, Mungzi, Yunnan, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Cirrhotic portal hypertension Esophageal Variceal bleeding Gastric coronary vein embolization Gastric Variceal bleeding Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

摘要:
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with gastric coronary vein embolization (GCVE) for cirrhotic portal hypertensive variceal bleeding and compare outcomes of first-line with second-line treatment, coil with glue, and single-covered with double stents. Methods: Fifteen patients received TIPS plus GCVE as the first-line treatment for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, and 45 received it as second-line treatment. Preoperative and postoperative quantitative variables were compared using a paired t test. The incidence of survival rate, re-bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and shunt dysfunction were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The portal venous pressure was significantly decreased from 39.0 +/- 5.0 mm Hg to 22.5 +/- 4.4 mm Hg (P <= 0.001) after TIPS treatment. After 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months re-bleeding rates were 1.6%, 3.3%, 6.6%, 13.3%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. Shunt dysfunction rates were 5%, 0%, 10%, 16.6%, 1.6%, and 5%, respectively. Hepatic encephalopathy rates were 3.3%, 1.6%, 3.3%, 6.6%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. And survival rates were 100%, 100%, 100%, 96.6%, 93.3%, and 88.3% respectively. In comparative analysis, statistically significant differences were seen in re-bleeding between the first-line and second-line treatment groups (26.6% vs 24.4%, log-rank P=0.012), and survival rates between single-covered and double stent (3.7% vs 16.1%, log-rang (P=0.043). Conclusion: The results suggest that TIPS combined with GCVE is effective and safer in the treatment of cirrhotic portal hypertensive variceal bleeding. The use of TIP plus GCVE as first-line treatment, may be preferable for high-risk re-bleeding, and more than 25 mm Hg portal venous pressure with repeated variceal bleeding. However, the sample size was small. Therefore, large, randomized, controlled, multidisciplinary center studies are needed for further evaluation.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
JCR分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
最新[2023]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2022版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2021版] 出版后一年[2023版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Intervent Radiol, Jian She Rd, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Intervent Radiol, Jian She Rd, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China [*1]Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Jian she Road Erqi District 3rd Revision: July 27, 2023, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:82490 今日访问量:0 总访问量:681 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 云南省第一人民医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:云南省昆明市西山区金碧路157号