高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

The efficacy and safety of first-line therapies for preventing chronic post-surgical pain: A network meta-analysis(Open Access)

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Pain Medicine, The First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province, Yunnan, Kunming, China [2]Department of Orthopedics, The First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province, Yunnan, Kunming, China [3]Department of Gerontology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, Jiangbei, China [4]Department of Pain Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, Jiangbei, China [5]Institute of Ultrasound Imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, Jiangbei, China [6]Impactys Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Diego, CA, United States of America
出处:

关键词: Chronic post-surgical pain CPSP Mexiletine Nefopam Pregabalin

摘要:
Background: Due to conflicting evidence regarding first-line therapies for chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP), here we comparatively evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line therapies for the prevention of CPSP. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic drugs measuring pain three months or more post-surgery. Pairwise meta-analyses (a frequentist technique directly comparing each intervention against placebo) and network metaanalyses (a Bayesian technique simultaneously comparing several interventions via an evidence network) compared the mean differences for primary efficacy (reduction in all pain), secondary efficacy (reduction in moderate or severe pain), and primary safety (drop-out rate from treatment-related adverse effects). Ranking probabilities from the network meta-analysis were transformed using surface under the cumulative ranking analysis (SUCRA). Sensitivity analyses evaluated the impact of age, gender, surgery type, and outlier studies. Results: Twenty-four RCTs were included. Mexiletine and ketamine ranked highest in primary efficacy, while ketamine and nefopam ranked highest in secondary efficacy. Simultaneous SUCRA-based rankings of the interventions according to both efficacy and safety revealed that nefopam and mexiletine ranked highest in preventing CPSP. Through the sensitivity analyses, gabapentin and ketamine remained the mosthighly- ranked in terms of efficacy, while nefopam and ketamine remained the mosthighly- ranked in terms of safety. Conclusions: Nefopam and mexiletine may be considered as first-line therapies for the prevention of CPSP. On account of the paucity of evidence available on nefopam and mexiletine, gabapentin and ketamine may also be considered. Venlafaxine is not recommended for the prevention of CPSP. ©Ning et al.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2017版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2016版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Pain Medicine, The First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province, Yunnan, Kunming, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [3]Department of Gerontology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, Jiangbei, China [4]Department of Pain Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, Jiangbei, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:86960 今日访问量:0 总访问量:707 更新日期:2025-03-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 云南省第一人民医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:云南省昆明市西山区金碧路157号