高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Efficacy evaluation of nilotinib treatment in different genomic subtypes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Medical School of Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China. [2]Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, PR China. [3]Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xingjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang Province, PR China. [4]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, PR China. [5]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, PR China. [6]School of Clinical Medicine, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan 671000, PR China. [7]Yizheng People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 211400, Jiangsu Province, China. [8]Changzhi People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi Province, China.
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Nilotinib has been used as a third-line drug for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) after a failure of sunitinib. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nilotinib in different genomic subtypes of GISTs. We searched the English articles through EMBASE, Cochrane Library and PubMed Database regarding to the use of nilotinib on GISTs, which published up to February 15, 2019. Inclusion criteria were: GISTs patients received nilotinib in a clinical trial and had detailed genetic subtype records (such as KIT exon 9, KIT exon 11, or PDGFRA mutations, or wild-type). The clinical benefit rate was used to assess the efficacy of nilotinib. A total of 3 studies involving 218 GISTs were included in this meta-analysis. The overall OR (KIT group vs WT group) was 3.26 (95% CI: 1.14-9.28; P = 0.027, Pheterogeneity = 0.613). The overall OR in KIT exon 11 group vs WT group was 5.30 (95% CI: 1.79-15.68; P = 0.003, Pheterogeneity = 0.409). The overall OR in KIT exon 9 group vs WT group was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.02-0.86; P = 0.035, Pheterogeneity = 0.229). The overall OR in KIT exon 11 group vs exon 9 group was 9.96 (95% CI: 0.39-254.66; P < 0.0001, Pheterogeneity = 0.024). Different genotypes of GISTs showed different responses to nilotinib, and KIT exon 11-mutant GISTs mostly benefited from nilotinib, followed by KIT exon 9-mutant or WT one. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 肿瘤学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 肿瘤学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Medical School of Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:82555 今日访问量:0 总访问量:681 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 云南省第一人民医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:云南省昆明市西山区金碧路157号