高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

A better overall survival (OS) for total (ipsilateral) retroperitoneal lipectomy than standard complete resection in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a comparative multi-institutional study

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Department of Retroperitoneal Tumor Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China. [2]Department of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China. [3]Department of Surgery, Division of Breast, Endocrine and Soft Tissue Surgery, University of Southern California-Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA. [4]Department of Retroperitoneal Tumor Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. [5]Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. [6]Department of Abdominal Surgery, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming, China. [7]Department of Pathology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China. [8]HBR Data Science Ltd., Beijing, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS) total (ipsilateral) retroperitoneal lipectomy (TRL) complete R0/R1 resection multifocal retroperitoneal liposarcoma

摘要:
Complete resection (CR) serves as the standard of surgical treatment for retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS). Unfortunately, even at referral centers, recurrence rates are high, and CR may not address multifocal diseases, which are a common phenomenon in RPLS. We sought to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes of RPLS patients treated with total (ipsilateral) retroperitoneal lipectomy (TRL) and CR. Because TRL remove potentially multifocal tumors in the fat, patients may have a better prognosis than CR.Patients with primary/first-recurrent RPLS who had been treated at 5 referral centers were recruited from December 2014 to June 2018. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the effects of demographic, operative, and clinicopathological variables on the following primary endpoints: local recurrence (LR), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and overall survival (OS).A total of 134 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study, 53 of whom underwent TRL, and 81 of whom underwent CR. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, presentation (primary vs. first-recurrent RPLS), number of tumors (unifocal vs. multifocal) at presentation, and Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) grade. The TRL group had higher levels of preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) (13 vs. 12.5 g/dL; P=0.008) and a lower amount of intraoperative blood loss (400 vs. 500 mL; P=0.034), but there were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay (23 vs. 22 d; P=0.47) or complications (32 vs. 30; P=0.82) between the 2 groups. In a subset of patients with multifocal tumors at initial presentation, OS was more prolonged in those treated with TRL than those treated with CR (P=0.0272). Based on the multivariable analysis, primary liposarcoma and a low FNCLCC grade were associated with decreased LR and improved OS.TRL is a safe procedure that positively affects the OS of patients with multifocal RPLS. This novel strategy deserves further investigation in prospective studies.2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:研究与实验 4 区 肿瘤学
最新[2023]版:
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Retroperitoneal Tumor Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Retroperitoneal Tumor Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China. [*1]Department of Retroperitoneal Tumor Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, No.1 Shengming Yuan Road, Zhongguancun Life Science Park, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:82490 今日访问量:0 总访问量:681 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 云南省第一人民医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:云南省昆明市西山区金碧路157号