高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Meta-analysis of new intervention measures for preventing side effects of artificial joint replacement

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ ESCI

机构: [1]Tradit Chinese Med Hosp Pingshan, Dept Orthopaed, Yibin 645350, Sichuan, Peoples R China [2]First Peoples Hosp Qujing, Dept Orthopaed, 1 Yuanlin Rd, Qujing 655099, Yunnan, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Artificial joint replacement Venous thromboembolism Side effects Interventions Meta-analysis

摘要:
BACKGROUND Intertrochanteric fracture of the femur occurs mostly among older people, and seriously affects daily life and quality of life. At present, physical intervention, drug treatment, routine intervention and rehabilitation training are widely used for prevention of side effects, but it is still inconclusive which intervention has the best effect. AIM To compare the effects of new intervention measures for preventing side effects of artificial joint replacement. METHODS We searched the Chinese and English literatures for comparative studies on the prevention of side effects of new interventions for artificial joint replacement from July 2013 to June 2023 in China HowNet, PubMed, Wanfang, Weipu and other databases. Study quality was evaluated by improved Jadad scoring standard, and the effects of different interventions on preventing different complications were analyzed by meta-analysis of evidence-based medicine with Review Manager 5.0 software. RESULTS Ten articles, including 869 cases, were finally included. The preventive effects of different interventions on the side effects of artificial joint replacement were studied, and valid data were extracted. There were two articles on the preventive effects of drug intervention, four on comparison of the preventive effects of combined and single interventions, and three on the preventive effects of physical intervention, rehabilitation training and routine intervention. Meta-analysis showed that the preventive effect of rivaroxaban was significantly better than low molecular weight heparin calcium [mean difference (MD) = -0.16, 95%CI: -0.28 to -0.04, P < 0.05]. The effect of combined intervention was significantly better than that of single intervention (MD = -0.08, 95%CI: -0.16 to -0.01, P < 0.001). Physical intervention was significantly better than routine intervention and rehabilitation training (MD = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.16-0.36, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Rivaroxaban combined with rehabilitation training is preferred for preventing deep vein thrombosis after artificial joint replacement. In the prevention of pulmonary embolism, rivaroxaban drug intervention is given priority. The effect of combined intervention is better than that of single intervention.

语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
JCR分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
最新[2023]版:
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2023版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Tradit Chinese Med Hosp Pingshan, Dept Orthopaed, Yibin 645350, Sichuan, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [2]First Peoples Hosp Qujing, Dept Orthopaed, 1 Yuanlin Rd, Qujing 655099, Yunnan, Peoples R China [*1]Department of Orthopaedics, The First People's Hospital of Qujing, No. 1 Yuanlin Road, Qujing 655099, Yunnan Province, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:82587 今日访问量:0 总访问量:681 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 云南省第一人民医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:云南省昆明市西山区金碧路157号