高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Treatment of major depressive disorders with generic duloxetine and paroxetine: a multi-centered, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled clinical trial

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ 统计源期刊 ◇ CSCD-C

机构: [1]Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China [2]Department of Psychiatry, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China [3]Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical College, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China [4]Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China [5]Hebei Mental Health Center, Baoding, Hebei Province, China [6]Guangzhou Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China [7]Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China [8]First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an, Jiao Tong University Medical College, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China [9]Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: China Duloxetine Efficacy Major depressive disorder Paroxetine Randomized controlled trial Safety

摘要:
Background: This study is a pre-registration trial of generic duloxetine that was approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (approval number: 2006L01603). Aim: Compare the treatment efficacy and safety of generic duloxetine to that of paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorders (MDD). Methods: This was a double-dummy, double-blind, multicenter, positive drug (paroxetine), parallel randomized controlled clinical trial. The 299 patients with MDD recruited for the study were randomly assigned to use duloxetine (n=149; 40-60 mg/d) or paroxetine (n=150; 20 mg/d) for 8 weeks. The Hamilton Depression rating scale (HAMD-17) was administered at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after starting treatment. Remission was defined as a HAMD-17 score below 8 at the end of the trial, and treatment effectiveness was defined as a decrease in baseline HAMD-17 score of at least 50% by the end of the trial. Safety was assessed based on the reported prevalence and severity of side effects and changes in laboratory and electrocardiographic findings. Three patients in the duloxetine group dropped out before starting medication, so results were analyzed using a modified intention-to-treat (ITT) method with 146 in the experimental group and 150 in the control group. Results: Both groups experienced 29 dropouts during the 8-week trial. HAMD-17 scores decreased significantly from baseline throughout the trial in both groups. Based on the ITT analysis, at the end of the trial there was no significant difference between the duloxetine group and the paroxetine group in effectiveness (67.1% v. 71.3%, X2=0.62 p=0.433), remission rate (41.1% v. 51.3%, X2=3.12, p=0.077), or in the incidence of side effects (56.8% v. 54.7%, X2=0.14, p=0.705). Conclusion: Generic duloxetine is as effective and safe as paroxetine in the acute treatment of patients with MDD who seek care at psychiatric outpatient departments in China. © 2015, Editorial Department of the Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry. All right reserved.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China [2]Department of Psychiatry, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Efficacy and safety of oral Guanxinshutong capsules in patients with stable angina pectoris in China: a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial [2]Evaluation of safety and efficacy of Qinming8631 DR implantable cardiac pacemaker in Chinese patients: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of the first domestically developed pacemaker of China(Open Access) [3]Effectiveness of mirtazapine as add-on to paroxetine v. paroxetine or mirtazapine monotherapy in patients with major depressive disorder with early non-response to paroxetine: a two-phase, multicentre, randomized, double-blind clinical trial [4]Efficacy and safety of quetiapine extended release monotherapy in bipolar depression: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial [5]The association of depressive symptoms with disability among adults in China. [6]Identification of SLC25A37 as a major depressive disorder risk gene. [7]Case report of body dysmorphic disorder in a suicidal patient [8]Integration of GWAS and brain eQTL identifies FLOT1 as a risk gene for major depressive disorder [9]Integrative analyses of major histocompatibility complex loci in the genome-wide association studies of major depressive disorder. [10]Comparisons of efficacy and safety of 400 or 800 ml bacterial count fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of recurrent hepatic encephalopathy: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in China

资源点击量:82490 今日访问量:0 总访问量:681 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 云南省第一人民医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:云南省昆明市西山区金碧路157号